This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
license [2013/05/05 12:22]
reid created
license [2013/05/28 01:31] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +  * GPL only for codes
 +  * CC BY-SA 3.0 for other content
 ======License history====== ======License history======
-When we started this project we used a content and code base from The Mana World. This had good and bad points, the good ones were that the game skeleton was present, we just needed to work on the game itself, and in the functions that we wanted to add. But bad points were that we were stuck with their guidelines, as it would be as much work as starting from scratch a new game as to change them+Most of the groundwork from Evol comes from The Mana World and eAthena
- +Both of these two projects use the GNU GPLv2 as license, so we inherited ​it while forking ​The Mana World
-Over the years, we decided to change //​some// ​of these guidelines, which we found incoherent with our game idea. One of these decision was to change ​the license ​kind that we inherited ​from them: The [[http://​www.gnu.org/​licenses/​gpl-2.0.html|GNU Public License version 2]]. This license was designed for source code such as the C used in the server, the C++ in the client and in eAthena scripts and XML files used in the game content. +
- +
-That's all. The GNU is badly designed for other game content like sound effects, musics and any graphics used.+
-======Our license policy====== +The GPL is a well known and largly used license through the FLOSS world, this is why it's a good choice to keep using it. 
-- GPL only for codes +  * Missing arguments why we want to change. 
-- CC BY-SA 3.0 for other content +======Why this choice====== 
-Why not other CC+  * Comparaison to other well known license, and our wish. 
 +  * Why not other license + advantage of CC 
 +  ​* ​Why not other CC
-Our actual work on changing the license +======Approving our license====== 
-Brief disclamer for those who accept the dual-license and the abandon of the GPL support+  * Our actual work on changing the license 
 +  ​* ​Brief disclamer for those who accept the dual-license and the abandon of the GPL support 
 +  * Name of those who accept to release their work as CC BY-SA 3.0.